Labor Day Sale: Save 20% on ALL products and subscriptions with code LABORDAY — for a limited time!

Evidence and Professional Reference Base

 

Attention, Memory, and Cognitive Load

These sources support our contents emphasis on attention, concise explanations, limited cues, sequencing, chunking, demonstration, and avoiding information overload.

 

Retrieval, Spacing, Retention, and Durable Learning

  • Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
  • Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. III. (2008). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Science, 319(5865), 966–968. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152408
  • Roediger, H. L. III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
  • Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties. In M. A. Gernsbacher et al. (Eds.), Psychology and the Real World. Worth Publishers.
  • Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Learning versus performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000

These works support retrieval practice, spaced review, delayed checks, interleaving, purposeful repetition, and the distinction between temporary practice performance and lasting learning.

 

Learning Styles and Instructional Adaptation

These support the decision not to label athletes as fixed “visual,” “auditory,” or “kinesthetic” learners. Our content  instead recommends selecting instruction according to the task, the athlete’s prior knowledge, and the athlete’s response.

 

Motor Learning and Skill Acquisition

  • Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C. J., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Human Kinetics.
  • Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. I. Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. McGraw Hill.
  • Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human Performance. Brooks/Cole.
  • Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade and H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor Development in Children. Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing practice effects. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
  • Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.2.179
  • Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 355–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355
  • Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor-skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677

These references support progressions, prerequisite assessment, practice variability, reduced assistance, transfer, purposeful drill selection, and the appropriate fading of feedback.

 

Coaching Cues, Demonstration, and Focus of Attention

These inform the Coaching Cue Builder, Demonstration Planner, use of external cues, brief instructions, peer modeling, and the explain–demonstrate–attempt cycle.

 

Feedback and Correction

These support specific, actionable feedback; separating outcome from process feedback; prioritizing one useful correction; athlete self-evaluation; and avoiding excessive coach dependence.

 

Deliberate Practice and Coaching Effectiveness

 

Motivation, Confidence, Autonomy, and Psychological Safety

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.
  • Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Human Kinetics.

These sources inform high support plus high expectations, constructive responses to mistakes, confidence-building, athlete voice, autonomy-supportive coaching, and willingness to attempt challenging skills.

 

Pressure, Anxiety, and Performance Transfer

These inform the Pressure Practice Ladder, competition simulations, reset routines, pre-performance cues, and gradual exposure to performance demands.

 

Youth-Sport Coaching and Athlete Development

  • Bergeron, M. F., et al. (2015). International Olympic Committee consensus statement on youth athletic development. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49, 843–851. IOC consensus statement
  • Mountjoy, M., et al. (2015). Safeguarding the child athlete in sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49, 883–886. Safeguarding review
  • Mountjoy, M., et al. (2016). International Olympic Committee consensus statement: Harassment and abuse in sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50, 1019–1029. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096121
  • Brenner, J. S., & American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness. (2016). Sports specialization and intensive training in young athletes. Pediatrics, 138(3), e20162148. AAP clinical report
  • SHAPE America. National Standards for Sport Coaches. Official coaching standards

 

Staff Training, Transfer, and Leadership Development

  • Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x
  • Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2011). The transfer of training: What really matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00373.x
  • Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661
  • Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. The Adult Learner. Routledge.
  • Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler.

The Kirkpatrick model is best treated as an evaluation framework, not proof that satisfaction surveys or immediate quizzes demonstrate behavior change.

 

Organizational Learning and Management

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley.
  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. Doubleday.
  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
  • Aguinis, H. (2019). Performance Management. Chicago Business Press.

These inform goal setting, coach-development plans, manager observation, feedback conversations, accountability, calibration, and continuing improvement.

 

Customer Experience, Retention, and Business Operations

  • Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
  • Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E. Jr., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review.
  • Reichheld, F. F., & Sasser, W. E. Jr. (1990). Zero defections: Quality comes to services. Harvard Business Review.

These support our contents business pathway connecting coaching quality, athlete progress, parent confidence, retention, referrals, reputation, and organizational performance. They do not imply that coaches should function as salespeople.

 

Cheer-Specific and Current Compliance Sources

 

USA Cheer

USA Cheer identifies its safety manual as a foundation for cheer safety and risk-management education, covering subjects such as legal and medical responsibilities, equipment, spotting, readiness, and progressions.

 

U.S. All Star Federation

USASF rules, age grids, credentialing requirements, membership requirements, and scoring systems may change by season. USASF states that credentialing evaluates knowledge of level rules and the ability to teach and break down permitted skills safely.

 

International and Event-Specific Rules

Depending on the gym and competitions entered, the following must also be consulted:

  • International All Star Federation rules and division requirements
  • Current competition producer rules
  • Current event score sheets and scoring rubrics
  • Bid-event and end-of-season championship requirements
  • Country, state, provincial, or regional federation requirements
  • School cheer rules if the facility also operates school programs
  • Facility insurance and risk-management requirements

The controlling source is the current rule set applicable to the particular athlete, division, event, season, and jurisdiction—not a general training-course statement.

 

Athlete Protection, Medical, and Legal Verification

 

Safeguarding and Abuse Prevention

The SafeSport Code is revised periodically. Its jurisdiction does not automatically extend to every private gym or every employee, but applicable governing-body requirements, laws, and the gym’s own policies may impose overlapping or additional duties.

 

Concussion, Emergency, and Medical Guidance

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HEADS UP concussion resources
  • American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness
  • Applicable state or provincial youth-sport concussion laws
  • Current CPR, first-aid, and automated external defibrillator standards
  • Facility emergency-action plan
  • Emergency medical provider and athletic-trainer guidance
  • Equipment manufacturer instructions
  • Insurance carrier requirements
  • Licensed healthcare-provider clearance and return-to-participation instructions

Medical diagnosis, injury treatment, and return-to-sport decisions must remain within the authority of qualified healthcare professionals.

 

 

Required Verification Statement

Before implementation, the gym should independently verify:

  • Current USASF, USA Cheer, IASF, event-producer, or other applicable rules
  • Coach credentialing and membership requirements
  • Legal skill restrictions and division requirements
  • Spotting practices and scope of coach authorization
  • Background-check and abuse-prevention requirements
  • Mandatory-reporting obligations
  • Concussion and return-to-participation laws
  • CPR, first-aid, AED, and emergency-action requirements
  • Employment, confidentiality, social-media, and recordkeeping laws
  • Insurance-policy conditions
  • Requirements specific to the gym’s country, state, province, municipality, and competitive season

The content is an educational and operational framework. It is not a substitute for governing-body rules, legal advice, medical advice, professional credentialing, or insurer requirements.